03 0.94, 1.47 0.89, 1.41 31 1.43, three.37 1.35, 3.20 0.001 0.002 0.03 0.87 0.86 0.02 0.07 1.15 1.244 0.98, 1.35 0.95, 1.32 34 0.58, 1.31 0.57, 1.29 1.37 1.31 1.20 1.178 1.00, 1.44 0.97, 1.39 36 0.91, 2.05 0.87, 1.96 2.23 two.12 1.20 1.148 0.99, 1.46 0.94, 1.39 56 1.57, three.18 1.48, three.03 0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.04 0.400 1.00 1.00 Referent Referent 1.17 1.504 1.02, 1.34 0.99, 1.30 98 1.06, 2.01 1.03, 1.95 two.16 two.05 1.19 1.108 0.96, 1.48 0.91, 1.42 27 1.36, 3.41 1.29, three.26 0.001 0.002 0.63 0.98 0.96 0.02 0.09 1.12 1.254 0.95, 1.31 0.93, 1.28 34 0.65, 1.49 0.63, 1.47 1.60 1.52 1.ten 1.175 0.92, 1.32 0.89, 1.28 37 1.06, two.41 1.01, two.30 2.36 two.27 1.21 1.159 1.00, 1.45 0.95, 1.39 50 1.62, 3.44 1.56, three.31 0.0001 0.0001 0.01 0.06 0.Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(1):84?Multivariate BRAF mutation statusBRAF-wildtype No. Age-adjusted Multivariated BRAF-mutated No. Age-adjusted Multivariated 1.00 1.00 67 Referent Referent 1.28 1.24 89 0.93, 1.76 0.90, 1.71 1.43 1.38 22 0.87, two.33 0.84, two.25 0.08 0.13 0.83 0.81 31 0.54, 1.27 0.53, 1.25 1.19 1.15 28 0.76, 1.85 0.73, 1.79 two.08 two.00 48 1.43, 3.03 1.37, 2.92 0.0001 0.0001 Table continues 1.00 1.00 404 Referent Referent 1.20 1.16 522 1.05, 1.36 1.01, 1.32 1.28 1.22 114 1.03, 1.58 0.98, 1.52 0.003 0.02 1.14 1.11 261 0.97, 1.33 0.95, 1.30 1.16 1.11 187 0.97, 1.38 0.93, 1.33 1.24 1.18 164 1.03, 1.49 0.98, 1.43 0.02 0.Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(1):84?Table four. ContinuedSmoking Status Under no circumstances (n = 1,383,154 person-years) HR 95 CI Former (n = 1,278,369 person-years) HR 95 CI Present (n = 439,508 person-years) HR 95 CI 1?9 (n = 844,894 person-years) HR 95 CI Cumulative Pack-years of Smoking 20?9 (n = 511,272 person-years) HR 95 CI 40 (n = 338,416 person-years) HR 95 CIPtrendbPheterogeneity cPtrendbPheterogeneity cDNMT3B expression status DNMT3B-negative No. Age-adjusted Multivariated DNMT3B-positive No. Age-adjusted Multivariated 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 238 Referent Referent 52 Referent Referent 0.69 0.67 1.26 1.22 309 1.06, 1.49 1.02, 1.45 39 0.46, 1.05 0.44, 1.02 1.31 1.22 1.16 1.10 73 0.89, 1.51 0.84, 1.45 17 0.75, two.28 0.69, 2.13 0.95 0.76 0.05 0.0.0.160 1.21 1.19 0.99, 1.48 0.97, 1.46 15 0.51 0.50 0.28, 0.90 0.28, 0.89 0.79 0.75 1.11 1.104 0.88, 1.40 0.85, 1.36 16 0.45, 1.1073371-77-3 uses 39 0.42, 1.32 1.26 1.18 1.29 1.103 1.02, 1.63 0.96, 1.55 23 0.77, 2.08 0.71, 1.95 0.28 0.42 0.07 0.Smoking Cessation and Colorectal Cancer EpigeneticsAbbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CIMP, CpG island methylator phenotype; DNMT3B, DNA methyltransferase 3B; HR, hazard ratio; MSI, microsatellite instability; MSS, microsatellite steady. a All models had been stratified by calendar year of the questionnaire cycle, age, and sex.5-Bromo-2,3-dichloro-4-methylpyridine web b According to the linear trend test by utilizing the median value of every category.PMID:23539298 c Tests for heterogeneity (for a multivariate HR linear trend) with the associations of smoking with one particular molecular subtype versus the other molecular subtype (i.e., CIMP-low/negative vs. CIMPhigh; MSS vs. MSI-high; BRAF-wildtype vs. BRAF-mutated; DNMT3B-negative vs. DNMT3B-positive). d Models have been adjusted for body mass index, household history of colorectal cancer in any first-degree relative, regular use of aspirin, physical activity level, alcohol consumption, total caloric intake, and red meat intake.94 Nishihara et al.Table 5. Pack-years of Smoking Ahead of Age 30 Years, Age at Commence of Smoking, and Incident Colorectal Cancer Risk by Molecular Subtypesa in the Nurses’ Health Study (1980?008) plus the Health Specialists Follow-up Study (1986?008)Under no circumstances Smoker (n.